|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Tearavygh Quillam
COLSUP Tau Ceti Federation
|
Posted - 2008.10.08 08:04:00 -
[1]
Two words : "pe**** PDs".
|
Tearavygh Quillam
COLSUP Tau Ceti Federation
|
Posted - 2008.10.08 08:32:00 -
[2]
Originally by: EnacheV1
Originally by: Anaee
Originally by: Outfor Beer count update gbc killed 28 tcf capitals (25 dreads, 3 carriers)
and to do this, they loose 17 dreads and there was 3 GBC for 1 TCF during the fight, not very glorious.
good fight.
You forgot to mention how you (tcf) had 45 minutes of turkeyshoot while the cbg fleet was loading the system (check fir dread kill for tcf, first dread lose for tcf)
I'm amazed and sorry that for once you only brought so few numbers (~100?) to the fight, so that we could chop you down 1 by 1 while you were stuck loading your screen.
|
Tearavygh Quillam
COLSUP Tau Ceti Federation
|
Posted - 2008.10.08 11:04:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Butter Dog Edited by: Butter Dog on 08/10/2008 10:52:12
Originally by: Tearavygh Quillam
I'm amazed and sorry that for once you only brought so few numbers (~100?) to the fight, so that we could chop you down 1 by 1 while you were stuck loading your screen.
why dont you deploy caps against a small offline tower and lose 25 dreads about it
Why don't you actually be in local and get a clue.
|
Tearavygh Quillam
COLSUP Tau Ceti Federation
|
Posted - 2008.10.08 11:26:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Butter Dog
Originally by: Tearavygh Quillam
Originally by: Butter Dog Edited by: Butter Dog on 08/10/2008 10:52:12
Originally by: Tearavygh Quillam
I'm amazed and sorry that for once you only brought so few numbers (~100?) to the fight, so that we could chop you down 1 by 1 while you were stuck loading your screen.
why dont you deploy caps against a small offline tower and lose 25 dreads about it
Why don't you actually be in local and get a clue.
because its more fun to troll your stupidity on CAOD?
Resorting to calling people names when all your arguments fail is your most common "troll", shall we say. Please, continue.
|
Tearavygh Quillam
COLSUP Tau Ceti Federation
|
Posted - 2008.10.08 11:34:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Butter Dog
Originally by: Tearavygh Quillam
Resorting to calling people names when all your arguments fail is your most common "troll", shall we say. Please, continue.
you are TCF's best poaster
Is that suppose to mean anything?
|
Tearavygh Quillam
COLSUP Tau Ceti Federation
|
Posted - 2008.10.08 11:51:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Butter Dog
Originally by: Norsey
Not having highend moonmining as an excuse for not holding your own is a poor excuse in my opinion, FDN doesnt have highend moon mining, we managed to hold our own against TCF and Red allianse on many occasion.
This is an incredibly poorly thought out statement.
TRI are fighting a vastly numerically and resource superior opponent. Calling them out as making 'excuses' for not holding their own is ridiculous. Why the hell should they?
You could at best describe them as a 'medium sized' alliance. An alliance with the resources of TCF should be able to take them on alone. That they bring KIA/Daisho/Goons along is fine, if thats what they want to do.
But no-one of any sensible disposition could possibly complain that TRI get a little helping hand every so often from Uncle BoB.
The logic behind your arguement (and that of all the other TRI detractors moaning that they're not getting uberblobbed alone) is so flawed I can't understand how they even have the nerve to articulate it. To paraphrase a great philosopher: get real.
Why don't you grow up and get a clue?
|
Tearavygh Quillam
COLSUP Tau Ceti Federation
|
Posted - 2008.10.08 11:59:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Butter Dog
Originally by: Tearavygh Quillam
Originally by: Butter Dog
Originally by: Norsey
Not having highend moonmining as an excuse for not holding your own is a poor excuse in my opinion, FDN doesnt have highend moon mining, we managed to hold our own against TCF and Red allianse on many occasion.
This is an incredibly poorly thought out statement.
TRI are fighting a vastly numerically and resource superior opponent. Calling them out as making 'excuses' for not holding their own is ridiculous. Why the hell should they?
You could at best describe them as a 'medium sized' alliance. An alliance with the resources of TCF should be able to take them on alone. That they bring KIA/Daisho/Goons along is fine, if thats what they want to do.
But no-one of any sensible disposition could possibly complain that TRI get a little helping hand every so often from Uncle BoB.
The logic behind your arguement (and that of all the other TRI detractors moaning that they're not getting uberblobbed alone) is so flawed I can't understand how they even have the nerve to articulate it. To paraphrase a great philosopher: get real.
Why don't you grow up and get a clue?
why dont you deploy caps against a small offline tower and lose 25 dreads about it
Ran out of arguments? Ran out of names? Come on dude, you're much better than this. I feel you can do it.
|
Tearavygh Quillam
COLSUP Tau Ceti Federation
|
Posted - 2008.10.08 12:22:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Butter Dog
Originally by: Tearavygh Quillam
Ran out of arguments? Ran out of names? Come on dude, you're much better than this. I feel you can do it.
Given that you responded to my logical arguement with a 'grow and get a clue' troll, perhaps you need to follow your own advice in this instance?
Just saying...
You mean I should spend energy into making arguments on the Internet? Wow, dude, grow up a bit.
|
Tearavygh Quillam
COLSUP Tau Ceti Federation
|
Posted - 2008.10.08 12:30:00 -
[9]
Originally by: NokNok
Originally by: joshua cane
and all tcf dreads are replaced
and we aren't like 90 % eve alliance : omfg they have a cap fleet: warp out!! warp out !!dock!! dock!! like tri :)
Anyway cya soon in space.
You mean 'Oh, they cynoed in their caps, cya'
|
Tearavygh Quillam
COLSUP Tau Ceti Federation
|
Posted - 2008.10.08 12:44:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Butter Dog
Originally by: Tearavygh Quillam
Originally by: NokNok
Originally by: joshua cane
and all tcf dreads are replaced
and we aren't like 90 % eve alliance : omfg they have a cap fleet: warp out!! warp out !!dock!! dock!! like tri :)
Anyway cya soon in space.
You mean 'Oh, they cynoed in their caps, cya'
Why don't you grow up and get a clue?
Why don't you write me a half page of reasons?
|
|
Tearavygh Quillam
COLSUP Tau Ceti Federation
|
Posted - 2008.10.08 13:23:00 -
[11]
Originally by: touchvill
Originally by: Axia Firehead nice to see that tri isn t able to hold alone a fast call fleet from TCF. and you called yourself killer?
sad.. it s sad to see that you are only the shadow of your fame, or, past fame.
things will be better when you will put your hand on a prometium moon. just need to know who will hold it :)
see you in space
Everyone sing alone.
WHERE'S YOUR CAP FLEET GONE? WHERE'S YOUR CAP FLEET GONE?
Don't get so butt hurt about defeat. You are part of a coalition of fail coalitions, you should be accustomed to defeat by now.
To be honest, hearing TRI cap fleet cynoed out after ours cynoed in (while having equals size and composition) compensates for any loss. So much for the skill and "we wanna have fights" self given publicity.
|
Tearavygh Quillam
COLSUP Tau Ceti Federation
|
Posted - 2008.10.08 15:39:00 -
[12]
Originally by: touchvill
That just shows your low standards and how far you will stoop to claim a victory when you have been curbstomped.
I'll think twice when talking about low standards when refering to an alliance that has to filter its overview in combat to not shoot the "wrong enemies", but are embarassed to call it a "nap". Hell, TRI and BoB can even be called allies as they have a common goal and work towards it together.
|
Tearavygh Quillam
COLSUP Tau Ceti Federation
|
Posted - 2008.10.08 15:54:00 -
[13]
Originally by: touchvill
Originally by: Tearavygh Quillam
Originally by: touchvill
That just shows your low standards and how far you will stoop to claim a victory when you have been curbstomped.
I'll think twice when talking about low standards when refering to an alliance that has to filter its overview in combat to not shoot the "wrong enemies", but are embarassed to call it a "nap". Hell, TRI and BoB can even be called allies as they have a common goal and work towards it together.
Still doesn't change the fact you lost.
Still doesn't change the fact TRI ran like they always do when they bite too much. Sad truth, ain't it?
|
Tearavygh Quillam
COLSUP Tau Ceti Federation
|
Posted - 2008.10.08 16:46:00 -
[14]
Originally by: Goberth Ludwig
Originally by: Shadowsword
Originally by: Deva Blackfire
Originally by: Shadowsword
You had around 30 caps, We had 34. You had quite a bit more support. Odds were about equal,
From your killboard:
dreads: 25 (dead) + 3 (lack of mail/alive) = 28 total dreads carriers: 3 (dead) + 13 (lack of mail/alive) = 16 carriers
28+16 = 44
Just wanted to correct you on maths side. Dunno about the numbers on our side tho.
We had 34 when the fight with you started at the gate. There may have been singletons joining up later. But that's no excuse for you, since you had already decided to leave your caps gathering dust.
Why should we come up with excuses for the fact we didnt sit there and get ****d? I dont get it.
- Gob
I don't it either. Why would you find an excuse to not show us your skill and run like little girls.
|
Tearavygh Quillam
COLSUP Tau Ceti Federation
|
Posted - 2008.10.08 16:49:00 -
[15]
Originally by: touchvill
Originally by: Tearavygh Quillam
Originally by: touchvill
Originally by: Tearavygh Quillam
Originally by: touchvill
That just shows your low standards and how far you will stoop to claim a victory when you have been curbstomped.
I'll think twice when talking about low standards when refering to an alliance that has to filter its overview in combat to not shoot the "wrong enemies", but are embarassed to call it a "nap". Hell, TRI and BoB can even be called allies as they have a common goal and work towards it together.
Still doesn't change the fact you lost.
Still doesn't change the fact TRI ran like they always do when they bite too much. Sad truth, ain't it?
Bit too much? If I recall correctly it was you guys who started doing the biting in a 5 alliance coalition that's alligned to the largest coalition in game are talking about Tri biting off too much? If you guys wasn't so affraid of fighting as solo entities this wouldn't be an issue. However you continue to follow the trend that numbers is the mother of all. You reap what you sow, you got ganked get over it, stop whining and continue to fight.
You're not making sense. Try not to contradict yourself too much.
|
Tearavygh Quillam
COLSUP Tau Ceti Federation
|
Posted - 2008.10.08 18:03:00 -
[16]
Originally by: Wesley Baird
Originally by: Tearavygh Quillam Still doesn't change the fact TRI ran like they always do when they bite too much. Sad truth, ain't it?
Why don't you blue 1/2 of eve over it...oops you did that already
And you know what? We don't have to find a lame excuse not to.
|
Tearavygh Quillam
COLSUP Tau Ceti Federation
|
Posted - 2008.10.08 21:15:00 -
[17]
Originally by: Zandramus
sure we had 50 more support/sniper than you but taht doesnt make a difference against your 19 carriers when you cynoed in
we brought 15 dreads and 12 carreirs you brought 25 dreads and 19 carriers...see how those numbers dont match?
What you're looking at is our final numbers from the final battle. It grew up by 5 or 6 carriers/dreads since we initially cynoed in.
The numbers that you are giving about your fleet are inexact. It was more like 20 dreads and about 13 carriers, as our scout in zlz reported.
So, the numbers were even. That and taking into account your "skill" and so called eagerness for good fights, we didn't actually imagine you'd cyno out severals minutes after we got in.
In conclusion, you barely had an exact idea about our numbers and decided not to risk it and flee.
|
|
|
|